Comments on: Google Wave – Conversation Doesn't Have To Be Chess http://www.educer.org/2009/05/29/google-wave-conversation-doesnt-have-to-be-chess/ cooler than educr Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:36:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Fool's Mate http://www.educer.org/2009/05/29/google-wave-conversation-doesnt-have-to-be-chess/comment-page-1/#comment-95 Fool's Mate Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:36:12 +0000 http://www.educer.org/?p=64#comment-95 Hmmmm Hmmmm

]]> By: Andy Chantrill http://www.educer.org/2009/05/29/google-wave-conversation-doesnt-have-to-be-chess/comment-page-1/#comment-90 Andy Chantrill Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:33:29 +0000 http://www.educer.org/?p=64#comment-90 I see the analogy. I question whether hyper-realtime conversation in written form can flow as naturally as the spoken exchange, and whether it'll be possible to make sense of multi-threaded conversations by scanning through them quickly, or will we have to rely on the timelapse "replay" feature? This is something we've not experienced before, and new skills will have to be learned.<br><br>It'll definitely be fun pushing the limits of human interaction, and thanks again for the invite! I see the analogy. I question whether hyper-realtime conversation in written form can flow as naturally as the spoken exchange, and whether it'll be possible to make sense of multi-threaded conversations by scanning through them quickly, or will we have to rely on the timelapse “replay” feature? This is something we've not experienced before, and new skills will have to be learned.

It'll definitely be fun pushing the limits of human interaction, and thanks again for the invite!

]]> By: Andy Chantrill http://www.educer.org/2009/05/29/google-wave-conversation-doesnt-have-to-be-chess/comment-page-1/#comment-72 Andy Chantrill Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:33:29 +0000 http://www.educer.org/?p=64#comment-72 I see the analogy. I question whether hyper-realtime conversation in written form can flow as naturally as the spoken exchange, and whether it'll be possible to make sense of multi-threaded conversations by scanning through them quickly, or will we have to rely on the timelapse "replay" feature? This is something we've not experienced before, and new skills will have to be learned.<br><br>It'll definitely be fun pushing the limits of human interaction, and thanks again for the invite! I see the analogy. I question whether hyper-realtime conversation in written form can flow as naturally as the spoken exchange, and whether it'll be possible to make sense of multi-threaded conversations by scanning through them quickly, or will we have to rely on the timelapse “replay” feature? This is something we've not experienced before, and new skills will have to be learned.

It'll definitely be fun pushing the limits of human interaction, and thanks again for the invite!

]]>