<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Educer &#187; idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.educer.org/tag/idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.educer.org</link>
	<description>cooler than educr</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 02:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter As News</title>
		<link>http://www.educer.org/2009/05/26/twitter-as-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.educer.org/2009/05/26/twitter-as-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.educer.org/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brief thoughts on an idea that&#8217;s been extensive in my head lately. Twitter has long been talked about as a news source. If it ever decides to work as a news source, or if we ever decide to actually use it as one, there will be two parts: The raw news will be complete madness, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brief thoughts on an idea that&#8217;s been extensive in my head lately.</p>
<p>Twitter has long been talked about as a news source. If it ever decides to work as a news source, or if we ever decide to actually use it as one, there will be two parts:</p>
<ol>
<li>The <strong>raw</strong> news will be complete madness, and everybody will be allowed in.</li>
<li>Many somebodies, from many different groups and interests, will harness the madness into usefulness.</li>
</ol>
<p>This is easier (ha) than it sounds.</p>
<p>Six degrees of separation, or something similar to that, will determine that I as an <strong>editor/publisher</strong> can choose my trusted raw news sources that cover my area of interest. If I&#8217;m looking for local news in my town of 30,000, I only need a handful of trusted sources sending out raw news in order for me to edit/publish an aggregation of news for that locality.  A larger city (Chicago) only requires a handful more sources.</p>
<p>For edit/publishing tasks, I will have a way to strip out tweets that are unrelated from that stream and a way to categorize the tweets that are related. Once a category (story) has valuable information from enough sources, it will be published. Once published, it remains alive. I can remove/add information and sources. Everyone can react, republish, comment, or do whatever they would like with that story.</p>
<p>More later I think. I might be working on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.educer.org/2009/05/26/twitter-as-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
